Race Result

Lotus 79 Grand Prix Series

Sebring International Raceway (International) ·Week 3

SoF 2784 Drivers 22 Laps 23 Incidents 93 (4.2/driver) Category Road Date Oct 2, 2022 · 16:30 UTC
Winner Peter Konieczny Fastest Lap Peter Konieczny 1:46.093 Hard Charger Jack S. +14
3 splits
Race Results
Pos Driver License iR Car Grid +/− Laps Led Fastest Inc Pts
Peter Konieczny A 3.71 3.3k +81 Lotus 79 2 +1 23 15 1:46.093 1 169
Christophe D. A 3.98 3.5k +67 Lotus 79 1 -1 23 8 1:46.431 3 160
Javier Mosquera A 3.74 3.6k +55 Lotus 79 3 0 23 0 1:46.607 0 152
4 Ryan VanVoorst A 4.31 3.3k +55 Lotus 79 9 +5 23 0 1:46.921 0 144
5 Guillermo Martín González Díaz B 2.62 2.6k +67 Lotus 79 11 +6 23 0 1:46.448 2 136
6 Marco S. A 3.95 2.8k +51 Lotus 79 8 +2 23 0 1:47.203 4 128
7 Jack S. B 2.60 2.6k +50 Lotus 79 21 +14 23 0 1:46.934 3 120
8 Markus E. A 4.91 2.8k +33 Lotus 79 10 +2 23 0 1:47.013 0 112
9 Tamás B. A 4.57 3.2k +12 Lotus 79 5 -4 23 0 1:46.872 6 104
10 Miguel F. B 2.75 3.2k +1 Lotus 79 13 +3 23 0 1:46.826 8 96
11 Shane A Seiwerts A 4.35 3.6k -18 Lotus 79 4 -7 23 0 1:46.450 4 88
12 Óscar S. C 2.60 2.7k -2 Lotus 79 7 -5 23 0 1:47.028 8 80
13 Tina K. A 3.26 2.5k -5 Lotus 79 12 -1 23 0 1:46.957 11 72
14 Jason Clapper B 2.55 2.5k -12 Lotus 79 22 +8 23 0 1:46.524 11 64
15 Armando Edwards A 3.60 2.8k -31 Lotus 79 6 -9 23 0 1:46.975 5 56
16 Nathaniel P. A 4.86 2.3k -26 Lotus 79 16 0 23 0 1:47.651 2 48
17 Cam Porter A 3.93 2.5k -40 Lotus 79 20 +3 23 0 1:47.950 2 40
18 Miguel M. A 4.43 2.4k -46 Lotus 79 14 -4 20 0 1:48.039 6 32
19 Germán S. C 2.68 2.6k -63 Lotus 79 15 -4 17 0 1:47.087 5 24
20 Ryan Turcotte B 2.45 2.5k -69 Lotus 79 19 -1 16 0 1:48.980 4 16
21 Marty N. A 3.45 2.5k -78 Lotus 79 18 -3 3 0 1:50.956 4 8
22 Jon Tackabury A 4.37 2.3k -82 Lotus 79 17 -5 2 0 1:49.889 4 4
3.3k +81
iR
2 → 1
Grid→Fin
+1
+/−
1
Inc
1:46.093
Fastest
23
Laps
15
Led
169
Pts
Lotus 79
A 3.98
3.5k +67
iR
1 → 2
Grid→Fin
-1
+/−
3
Inc
1:46.431
Fastest
23
Laps
8
Led
160
Pts
Lotus 79
3.6k +55
iR
3 → 3
Grid→Fin
0
+/−
0
Inc
1:46.607
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
152
Pts
Lotus 79
A 4.31
3.3k +55
iR
9 → 4
Grid→Fin
+5
+/−
0
Inc
1:46.921
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
144
Pts
Lotus 79
2.6k +67
iR
11 → 5
Grid→Fin
+6
+/−
2
Inc
1:46.448
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
136
Pts
Lotus 79
A 3.95
2.8k +51
iR
8 → 6
Grid→Fin
+2
+/−
4
Inc
1:47.203
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
128
Pts
Lotus 79
B 2.60
2.6k +50
iR
21 → 7
Grid→Fin
+14
+/−
3
Inc
1:46.934
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
120
Pts
Lotus 79
A 4.91
2.8k +33
iR
10 → 8
Grid→Fin
+2
+/−
0
Inc
1:47.013
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
112
Pts
Lotus 79
A 4.57
3.2k +12
iR
5 → 9
Grid→Fin
-4
+/−
6
Inc
1:46.872
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
104
Pts
Lotus 79
B 2.75
3.2k +1
iR
13 → 10
Grid→Fin
+3
+/−
8
Inc
1:46.826
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
96
Pts
Lotus 79
A 4.35
3.6k -18
iR
4 → 11
Grid→Fin
-7
+/−
4
Inc
1:46.450
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
88
Pts
Lotus 79
C 2.60
2.7k -2
iR
7 → 12
Grid→Fin
-5
+/−
8
Inc
1:47.028
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
80
Pts
Lotus 79
13
Tina K.
A 3.26
2.5k -5
iR
12 → 13
Grid→Fin
-1
+/−
11
Inc
1:46.957
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
72
Pts
Lotus 79
B 2.55
2.5k -12
iR
22 → 14
Grid→Fin
+8
+/−
11
Inc
1:46.524
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
64
Pts
Lotus 79
A 3.60
2.8k -31
iR
6 → 15
Grid→Fin
-9
+/−
5
Inc
1:46.975
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
56
Pts
Lotus 79
A 4.86
2.3k -26
iR
16 → 16
Grid→Fin
0
+/−
2
Inc
1:47.651
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
48
Pts
Lotus 79
A 3.93
2.5k -40
iR
20 → 17
Grid→Fin
+3
+/−
2
Inc
1:47.950
Fastest
23
Laps
0
Led
40
Pts
Lotus 79
A 4.43
2.4k -46
iR
14 → 18
Grid→Fin
-4
+/−
6
Inc
1:48.039
Fastest
20
Laps
0
Led
32
Pts
Lotus 79
C 2.68
2.6k -63
iR
15 → 19
Grid→Fin
-4
+/−
5
Inc
1:47.087
Fastest
17
Laps
0
Led
24
Pts
Lotus 79
B 2.45
2.5k -69
iR
19 → 20
Grid→Fin
-1
+/−
4
Inc
1:48.980
Fastest
16
Laps
0
Led
16
Pts
Lotus 79
A 3.45
2.5k -78
iR
18 → 21
Grid→Fin
-3
+/−
4
Inc
1:50.956
Fastest
3
Laps
0
Led
8
Pts
Lotus 79
A 4.37
2.3k -82
iR
17 → 22
Grid→Fin
-5
+/−
4
Inc
1:49.889
Fastest
2
Laps
0
Led
4
Pts
Lotus 79